Author summary
â 15% 1 analyzed article/video 1,620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AlĂcia FĂ bregas results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 315 hits . Analysis detected 2,540 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of â 17% (7,905 of 9,471 authors). This AlĂcia FĂ bregas is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group. AlĂcia FĂ bregas
Author details
Total words: 6,480
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.5% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst