Author summary
97% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,577 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Tabet results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 2,884 hits . Analysis detected 16,526 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,145 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (2,406 of 9,471 authors). This Alex Tabet is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Alex Tabet
Author details
Total words: 10,145
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.6% percentile 3.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 28.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Genetic Fallacy: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Horn Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst