Author summary
26% 3 analyzed articles/videos 558 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aimee Cunningham results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 184 hits . Analysis detected 1,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,268 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (7,254 of 9,439 authors). This Aimee Cunningham is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Aimee Cunningham
Author details
Total words: 3,268
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst