Author summary
8%2 analyzed articles/videos1,331 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aidan Quigley results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 990 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,324 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (8,420 of 9,471 authors). This Aidan Quigley is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Aidan Quigley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
12%Aidan Quigley (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,324
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510011.1% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.2%1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos