Author summary
36% 1 analyzed article/video 2,996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrian Parham results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 785 hits . Analysis detected 5,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 14% (8,208 of 9,471 authors). This Adrian Parham is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. Adrian Parham
Author details
Total words: 11,984
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.3% percentile 1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst