Author summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrian Back results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 1,122 hits . Analysis detected 3,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,860 of 9,471 authors). This Adrian Back is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Adrian Back
Author details
Total words: 3,728
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 30.1% 30.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 30.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst