Author summary
60%2 analyzed articles/videos612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrian Ashford results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 458 hits. Analysis detected 2,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,998 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (6,124 of 9,471 authors). This Adrian Ashford is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Adrian Ashford
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
36%Adrian Ashford (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,998
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate