Author summary
42% 1 analyzed article/video 959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abigail Covington results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 378 hits . Analysis detected 2,223 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 48% (4,822 of 9,277 authors). This Abigail Covington is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. Abigail Covington
Author details
Total words: 3,836
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.8% 9.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst