Author summary
36% 1 analyzed article/video 1,788 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abdel Qader Sabbah results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 888 hits . Analysis detected 4,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 46% (5,113 of 9,452 authors). This Abdel Qader Sabbah is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group. Abdel Qader Sabbah
Author details
Total words: 7,152
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst