Author summary
67% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,943 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abbey Mastracco results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 2,322 hits . Analysis detected 15,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,023 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 35% (5,696 of 8,706 authors). This Abbey Mastracco is better (less manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group. Abbey Mastracco
Author details
Total words: 18,023
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles18K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.9% 12.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst