Author summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Sarin results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 2,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (1,496 of 9,213 authors). This Aaron Sarin is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Aaron Sarin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠84%Aaron Sarin (selected)5%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,628
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510083.8% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 22.2%22.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 7.4%7.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 13.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The Pacific's True Rogue State⁠50%
Quillette⁠61%By Aaron Sarin⁠71%7/14/2026, 5:54:35 PM