BS Summary: This video contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 2.2% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 45 faulty-reasoning hits from 970 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.2% and a BS Rank of 66% (10,636 of 30,584 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the video peer group.
Uh uh. All right. So Michelle,
>> Dana,
>> well, so this is not necessarily an
entirely new take for her. She remember
is the one who said, "When they go low,
we go high." Now, she revised her
remarks a little bit later on. Um but
generally, she has not she's not the one
who said deplorables,
>> right?
>> Right. They were constantly cleaning up
other people's um situation or things
that they said. Um and Barack Obama
also, they they've had similar takes on
this. So I think that they understand
it. She said something there that makes
me think I say this too and it's okay
when she said you can't blame them for
being angry even if they vote for a way
that is against their own interest.
>> Okay, that's that's a condescending way
to say that we know better than you do
in terms of what is better for you. And
I and I bristle, right? But then I think
well I think I kind of do that too
because when I think about the disaster
of especially inner city school
education and you wonder like why won't
they vote these people out? Why don't
they go after the teachers unions? It's
not in their interest to keep doing it.
And there is maybe room to sort of meet
on in the middle here. I do believe that
the conservative position on school
choice is winning the idea argument and
the policy argument because in President
Bush's excuse me Trump's big beautiful
bill I think it was in the big beautiful
bill the money for school choice. So
then the states were given an option. Do
you want to take the money or do you not
want to take the money? And so far I
think it's pretty interesting who has
taken it including Governor Polus of
Colorado because school choice is a huge
issue there. and also just last week
Kathy Hokll the governor of New York. So
you can win and on ideas and show people
that I believe our position is better
for your interests and try to be
persuasive that way. Um so just
something I'm thinking about.
>> Are you thinking about that, Harold?
You're doing a lot of nodding. No, no, I
I I agree. Look, I I give Michelle Obama
a lot of credit here. This is the notion
of just being critical of people and
looking down on people. And I understand
what VP was saying about maybe some of
the wording, but I think she's giving a
message to Democrats that just because
President Trump's numbers or Republicans
numbers may not be as rosy as they would
like. If you look at our numbers,
they're not great. People don't not
necessarily say they want Democrats to
be in charge. So you can't you can't
criticize the voters. You can't
criticize Trump o only without offering
some ideas. and whether it's school
choice, whether it's figuring out ways
to invigorate and rekindle small
business growth across the country,
trying to figure out ways in which to
lower health care costs. These are the
things that people want most of. So, I
give her I give her a lot of credit.
What about you, Emily? Let me give her a
C minus because to me the her whole
narrative was framed around that
everyone was angry that she knows better
than them and that there was no other
option rather than the agency of every
voter to say I choose this man because
he represents my values. And remember
the exit polling where overwhelmingly 80
plus percent of pollers came out saying
he fights for someone like me. So it
wasn't I'm angry and I want something
different which is how she framed it. I
think it was more thoughtful and
resonating than that where people said I
choose finally someone who has stepped
onto the stage that I actually believe
in. Whereas in many places where the
choices before you are a buffet of
socialism or a buffet of incompetence
like I've been subjected to in
California my whole life. And on the
Mark Cuban thing, I I think this is this
is what really irritates me so much and
I think it's a reflection of the
mainstream media and social media now.
The concept that the questions would be
does this mean that you've somehow
shifted alliance and allegiances that
there's no room for simply a shared
incentive and a shared value. This is
what we've been asking for this entire
time for this country that people see
America first and that they see a win
for Trump lowering prescription drug
prices. Where are the Democrats to say,
"Hey, this is amazing. Thank you so
much. Hey, I support this plan. Hey, I
don't support the president in these
policies, but I support this one, which
you do.
>> Well, Mark Cuban is there. He's clearly
>> correct. That's what I'm saying. Versus
the reporter that framed it as does this
mean you have completely rejected. And
my whole point is that Mark Cuban is
illustrating what it means to value that
shared incentive and either keeping
politics out of it or saying, "Oh, I'm
still voting for someone else." But here
is where he and I agree. And here is
where I applaud this because it benefits
all Americans. We have only seen up
until now people cutting off their nose
to spite their face because they will do
anything against a Trump win, even if it
means letting the American people down.
Be sure to like and subscribe for all
the Fox News latest on YouTube and catch
full shows streaming now on Fox
Speakers
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.