Fox News99%

'TERRIFYING!': US city LOSES HUNDREDS of suspects on ankle monitors 97%

5/14/2026, 5:15:00 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 1,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 452 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 91.4% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,108 of 29,555 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 96.30% of the video peer group.

Sandra. 
>> Now, Bill, shocking details out of the Chicago area. 
A judge says they have lost track of hundreds of people who were placed on ankle monitors, all while facing pending criminal cases. 
The total number now thought to be at nearly 250 people. 
Terrifying. 
Mike Tobin is live in Chicago. 
He's got more details on this for us. 
Hi, Mike. 
And Sandra, it works out to 8% of the people on electronic monitoring in the pre-trial program in Cook County and Chicago who are unaccounted for. 
Even the state's attorney says we should all be deeply concerned. 
This is the same system that was ignored by Lawrence Reed, a career violent criminal with 72 arrests. 
His ankle monitor showed that he'd been out all night twice and was violating his curfew on November 17th of last year when police say he boarded Chicago's Elra and set a complete stranger, Bethany McGee, on fire. 
This is the same ankle monitor system that was ignored by 26-year-old Alfonso Tally. 
Records show he'd been in trouble for all of his adult life. 
He disregarded his curfew to the point that he didn't get home to charge the battery in the ankle monitor went dead. 
Police say on April 25th he went on a crime spree that ended with a mother of three pistol whipped with a broken nose. 
One police officer dead, another fighting for his life. 
3,048 people were released pre-trial on electronic monitoring. 
Almost 20% of them are charged with violent crimes. 
7% aggravated battery, 4% criminal sexual assault, 8% charged with murder, and 246 of them cannot be found. 
>> Not only are they missing, they have no idea they're at none. 
Zero. 
They don't know in the state of Illinois. 
They don't no idea where these individuals are. 
So, think about that. 
It's not like they could just go out and start looking for them. 
Like, they have no clue. 
The system alerts on a low battery or 
curfew violation. After 48 hours, a judge can be notified and that judge can issue an arrest warrant. 
But any sheriff's deputy will tell you there are thousands of warrants in the system. 
Without an alert on a specific individual, they get lost in the pile. 
But the Cook County Chief Judge did tell a local reporter yesterday that law enforcement is actively searching for the people who are at large. 
Sandra, 
>> that's quite a search. 
Mike Tobin on that for us out of Chicago. 
Thank you, Bill. 
Be sure to like and subscribe for all the Fox News latest on YouTube and catch full shows streaming now on Fox 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.7%Fox News: 13.7%Confirmation Bias2.7%This article: 21.0%Fox News: 2.4%Anchoring Bias21.0%This article: 28.8%Fox News: 9.9%Availability Heuristic28.8%This article: 7.1%Fox News: 1.8%Representativeness Heuristic7.1%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 2.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Fox News: 8.2%Overconfidence Bias7.7%This article: 5.5%Fox News: 15.3%Framing Effect5.5%This article: 2.9%Fox News: 1.1%Loss Aversion2.9%This article: 4.0%Fox News: 1.2%Status Quo Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 5.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 3.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 30.8%Fox News: 14.7%Negativity Bias30.8%This article: 4.9%Fox News: 4.1%Self-Serving Bias4.9%This article: 4.9%Fox News: 4.1%Fundamental Attribution Error4.9%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 5.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 3.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 4.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Fox News: 0.4%Horn Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.2%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 3.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Fox News: 1.5%Primacy Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 3.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 2.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.4%Fox News: 10.7%Appeal to Authority16.4%This article: 2.9%Fox News: 5.7%False Dilemma2.9%This article: 2.9%Fox News: 3.3%Slippery Slope2.9%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.7%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 26.1%Fox News: 14.2%Hasty Generalization26.1%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.3%Fox News: 1.5%Bandwagon3.3%This article: 7.5%Fox News: 15.8%Appeal to Emotion7.5%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 3.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 13.3%Fox News: 4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.3%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.4%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 3.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.0%Fox News: 1.2%Composition/Division4.0%This article: 20.8%Fox News: 5.7%Anecdotal20.8%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.6%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 3.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.5%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 2.7%Fox News: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy2.7%This article: 34.5%Fox News: 1.7%Unattributed Quote34.5%This article: 2.2%Fox News: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection2.2%This article: 7.3%Fox News: 3.6%Biased Writer Voice7.3%This article: 0.9%Fox News: 1.3%Indoctrination0.9%This article: 0.0%Fox News: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Fox News: 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias7.1%This article: 4.9%Fox News: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.9%

452 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers68%attributed speech145writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageBill • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSandra • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageSandra • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSandra • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSandra • 2 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageMike Tobin • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 38 words • 100.0% coverageMike Tobin • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 22 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 24 words • 100.0% coverageMike Tobin • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 9 words • 100.0% coverageMike Tobin • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSandra • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSandra • 3 words • 0.0% coverageFox News • 22 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Fox News

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words7.2% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Fox News: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +93.1 ptsWriter: 6.9%Fox News: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-40.7 ptsWriter: 40.7%Fox News: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.9 ptsWriter: 15.9%Fox News: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%Fox News: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%Fox News: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.