Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Youth Well Being results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hindsight Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 1,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (3,589 of 24,302 topics). This Youth Well Being is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
Youth Well Being
Topic details
Total words: 972
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.2% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles972 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.9%16.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.6%6.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.6%9.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.9%9.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Composition/Division: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos