Topic summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video1,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Years Of Lead results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 497 hits. Analysis detected 3,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (12,483 of 22,481 topics). This Years Of Lead is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Years Of Lead
Topic details
Total words: 4,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos