Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 709 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Cup Corruption results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 973 hits . Analysis detected 5,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 87% (3,409 of 24,545 topics). This World Cup Corruption is worse (more manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group. World Cup Corruption
Topic details
Total words: 2,836
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.1% percentile 5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 34.3% 34.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 19.8% 19.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 34.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst