Topic summary
⁠26%3 analyzed articles/videos2,844 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voting By Mail results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 577 hits. Analysis detected 6,110 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,376 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (21,727 of 23,839 topics). This Voting By Mail is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group.
Voting By Mail
Topic details
Total words: 11,376
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751008.9% percentile
1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos