Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Visceral Understanding results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 836 hits. Analysis detected 1,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,114 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,868 topics). This Visceral Understanding is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Visceral Understanding
Topic details
Total words: 16,114
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.0%0.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos