Topic summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video2,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Veterans Experiences results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 755 hits. Analysis detected 4,684 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (18,851 of 24,545 topics). This Veterans Experiences is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Veterans Experiences
Topic details
Total words: 8,440
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos