Topic summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Usl League Two results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 180 hits. Analysis detected 1,277 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (10,290 of 24,113 topics). This Usl League Two is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Usl League Two
Topic details
Total words: 2,124
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos