Topic summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Visa Policy results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 151 hits . Analysis detected 969 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 72% (7,022 of 24,539 topics). This US Visa Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. US Visa Policy
Topic details
Total words: 1,376
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.4% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst