Topic summary
83%1 analyzed article/video1,907 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Venezuela Relations results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 799 hits. Analysis detected 7,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 58% (10,149 of 23,996 topics). This US Venezuela Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
US Venezuela Relations
Topic details
Total words: 7,628
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.3%10.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos