Topic summary
⁠22%1 analyzed article/video593 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Social Security Administration Data results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 1,339 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (11,621 of 23,412 topics). This US Social Security Administration Data is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
US Social Security Administration Data
Topic details
Total words: 2,372
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Special Pleading: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos