Topic summary
⁠60%4 analyzed articles/videos1,461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Immigration results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,152 hits. Analysis detected 7,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,520 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (16,086 of 23,338 topics). This Us Immigration is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Us Immigration

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.1%12.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos