Topic summary
⁠89%2 analyzed articles/videos1,885 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States Department Of The Treasury results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 1,672 hits. Analysis detected 9,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,540 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (8,905 of 22,100 topics). This United States Department Of The Treasury is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
United States Department Of The Treasury
Topic details
Total words: 7,540
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.2%22.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos