Topic summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video4,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tribute Artists results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 767 hits. Analysis detected 2,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (21,494 of 22,540 topics). This Tribute Artists is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group.
Tribute Artists
Topic details
Total words: 16,800
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

5% percentile
02550751004.6% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles16.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos