Topic summary
69% 25 analyzed articles/videos 15,492 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Travis Kelce results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 9,699 hits . Analysis detected 63,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 73,744 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (18,185 of 24,545 topics). This Travis Kelce is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Travis Kelce
Topic details
Total words: 73,744
Article count: 25
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score25 analyzed articles73.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst