Topic summary
44% 12 analyzed articles/videos 8,045 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trade Deadline results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 2,346 hits . Analysis detected 18,699 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,136 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (22,993 of 24,566 topics). This Trade Deadline is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Trade Deadline
Topic details
Total words: 38,136
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.4% percentile 1.1% BS Score12 analyzed articles38.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst