Topic summary
⁠72%3 analyzed articles/videos2,058 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiktok Trends results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 635 hits. Analysis detected 5,983 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,443 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (13,527 of 23,803 topics). This Tiktok Trends is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Tiktok Trends
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%4-H Schedule1%
⁠0%4 H Schedule1%
⁠0%Musician Biographies1%
⁠0%Class Analysis1%
⁠0%Cleveland Politics1%
⁠44%Tiktok Trends (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 7,443
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos