Topic summary
⁠54%5 analyzed articles/videos3,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Team Management results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 1,531 hits. Analysis detected 9,189 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,885 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (17,888 of 23,996 topics). This Team Management is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Team Management
Topic details
Total words: 13,885
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.0%11.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos