Topic summary
⁠27%2 analyzed articles/videos696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Team Dynamics results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 347 hits. Analysis detected 1,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,836 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (18,881 of 22,927 topics). This Team Dynamics is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Team Dynamics
Topic details
Total words: 3,836
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510017.6% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos