Topic summary
⁠35%2 analyzed articles/videos970 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teachers results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 355 hits. Analysis detected 3,237 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,096 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (18,110 of 24,545 topics). This Teachers is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Teachers
Topic details
Total words: 6,096
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos