Topic summary
66% 3 analyzed articles/videos 6,601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teacher Retention results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 4,777 hits . Analysis detected 36,006 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,371 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (20,100 of 22,694 topics). This Teacher Retention is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Teacher Retention
Topic details
Total words: 56,371
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles56.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst