Topic summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video380 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taxpayer Savings results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 234 hits. Analysis detected 1,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (4,232 of 23,283 topics). This Taxpayer Savings is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Taxpayer Savings
Topic details
Total words: 1,520
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 15.4%15.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos