Topic summary
⁠13%3 analyzed articles/videos1,738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Revenue results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Anchoring Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 378 hits. Analysis detected 2,393 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,952 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (21,699 of 24,545 topics). This Tax Revenue is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group.
Tax Revenue
Topic details
Total words: 6,952
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510011.6% percentile
1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos