Topic summary
ā 67%1 analyzed article/video1,311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Systemic Neglect results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 543 hits. Analysis detected 4,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ā 53% (11,714 of 24,576 topics). This Systemic Neglect is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Systemic Neglect
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%4-H Schedule1%
ā 0%4 H Schedule1%
ā 0%Musician Biographies1%
ā 0%Cleveland Politics1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 53%Systemic Neglect (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos