Topic summary
10% 2 analyzed articles/videos 741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Swat Operations results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 151 hits . Analysis detected 1,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,964 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 33% (16,579 of 24,545 topics). This Swat Operations is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. Swat Operations
Topic details
Total words: 2,964
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst