Topic summary
ā 28%1 analyzed article/video640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stunt Performers results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 973 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ā 35% (15,600 of 23,677 topics). This Stunt Performers is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Stunt Performers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,560
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos