Topic summary
61% 9 analyzed articles/videos 5,596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strikes results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 2,042 hits . Analysis detected 15,936 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,904 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 21% (18,541 of 23,460 topics). This Strikes is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. Strikes
Topic details
Total words: 23,904
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles23.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst