Topic summary
⁠20%1 analyzed article/video1,774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Socioeconomic Status results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 505 hits. Analysis detected 3,070 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (20,529 of 22,951 topics). This Socioeconomic Status is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
Socioeconomic Status
Topic details
Total words: 7,096
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510010.6% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos