Topic summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos1,989 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Socioeconomic Disparities results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 917 hits. Analysis detected 4,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,956 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (14,804 of 24,564 topics). This Socioeconomic Disparities is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Socioeconomic Disparities
Topic details
Total words: 7,956
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.4%8.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos