Topic summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video1,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Servizio Informazioni Difesa (sid) results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 497 hits. Analysis detected 3,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (13,192 of 24,493 topics). This Servizio Informazioni Difesa (sid) is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Servizio Informazioni Difesa (sid)
Topic details
Total words: 4,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos