Topic summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video1,094 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sequel Comparison results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 1,085 hits. Analysis detected 3,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (12,575 of 23,744 topics). This Sequel Comparison is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Sequel Comparison
Topic details
Total words: 4,376
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.8%24.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos