Topic summary
⁠31%2 analyzed articles/videos1,642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Security Policy results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 625 hits. Analysis detected 2,480 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,092 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (14,270 of 24,545 topics). This Security Policy is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Security Policy
Topic details
Total words: 5,092
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos