Topic summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video1,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School Budget results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 350 hits. Analysis detected 2,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (16,405 of 22,291 topics). This School Budget is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
School Budget
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,604
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos