Topic summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Diego City Politics results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 556 hits. Analysis detected 2,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (16,232 of 24,545 topics). This San Diego City Politics is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
San Diego City Politics
Topic details
Total words: 4,080
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.6%13.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos