Topic summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Restaurant Hygiene results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Ad Hominem, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,181 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (8,711 of 23,516 topics). This Restaurant Hygiene is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Restaurant Hygiene
Topic details
Total words: 1,860
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Tu Quoque: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos