Topic summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Republican Senator's Support results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (12,971 of 24,564 topics). This Republican Senator's Support is better (less manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group.
Republican Senator's Support
Topic details
Total words: 3,080
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Special Pleading: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos