Topic summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regulatory Permits results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 364 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (14,140 of 24,085 topics). This Regulatory Permits is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Regulatory Permits
Topic details
Total words: 2,160
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 1.2%1.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos