Topic summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos1,890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regulatory Actions results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 834 hits. Analysis detected 4,977 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,368 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (20,572 of 23,582 topics). This Regulatory Actions is better (less manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
Regulatory Actions
Topic details
Total words: 9,368
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510012.8% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos